Re: ACTION A-645-07: schema for serialization parameters

On 16-06-28 07:47 AM, Abel Braaksma wrote:
>
> 1) I think we (now) both agree that the current production rules in
> XP31 allow whitespace in BracedURILiteral

There was some suggestion that this might have been an oversight. However,
when BracedURILiteral was added to the 3.0 grammars in Feb 2012, there was
at least some discussion of whitespace (though there aren't many details).
See:

Bugzilla Bug 15399, [XP3.0] Conflict between EQName syntax and JSON
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15399
in particular comment #8

and

minutes of meeting #500 in Prague
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-query/2012Feb/0023.html
under J4.4.1

and

my message re EBNF specifics
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-query/2012Feb/0024.html

-Michael

Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2016 00:55:58 UTC