W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsd-databinding@w3.org > May 2010

Re: XSD Interoperability Grade

From: Paul Kiel <paul@xmlhelpline.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:31:38 -0400
Message-ID: <31061be22479038ee89001fab87f84a7.squirrel@mail.xmlhelpline.com>
To: "Mark R Maxey" <Mark_R_Maxey@raytheon.com>
Cc: public-xsd-databinding@w3.org
This is a bit dated now, but much of it still applicable.


... for what its worth ...


W. Paul Kiel
xmlHelpline.com Consulting
work: 919-846-0224
cell: 919-449-8801
website: http://www.xmlhelpline.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/paulxml
Your helpline for xml solutions.

> Thank you for your work.  You've done a great job at identifying and
> categorizing schema patterns.  I'm having problems understanding the
> categories, though.
> Each pattern falls into a binary "basic" or "advance" category.  The
> "advance" category includes both widely used patterns, patterns that no
> one supports (e.g., AnyURIEnumerationType01 [advanced]), and patterns
> everyone supports (e.g., DecimalElement01 [advanced]).  Some patterns with
> identical support across vendors fall into different categories, e.g.,
> AttributeOptional01 [basic] & AttributeFixed01 [advanced].
> I would like to use your work to evaluate and refactor WSDLs & XSDs to
> maximize interoperability.  Given the current output, though, I don't
> think I could use it for that purpose.  What would be ideal for me is to
> be able to run a XSLT that would provide me feedback on which tools don't
> support a WSDL or XSD and a grade for each pattern found describing its
> interoperability.
> Have you considered anything like this?  Are there any plans to refresh
> the results every year or two based on bug fixes to the various products?
> Thanks,
> Mark Maxey
Received on Thursday, 27 May 2010 15:32:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:14 UTC