W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsd-databinding@w3.org > February 2007

Minutes from XML Schema Patterns for Databinding call 6 February 2007

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:42:13 -0000
Message-ID: <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC9522550A201515@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>

Minutes from today's call are here:

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/7/2/06-databinding-minutes.html

and below for tracker's searching:


                                   - DRAFT -

                         Databinding WG Teleconference

6 Feb 2007

   Agenda

   See also: IRC log

Attendees

   Present
          Jon Calladine (BT)
          George Cowe (Origo Services Limited)
          Paul Downey (BT)

   Regrets
          Vladislav Bezrukov (SAP AG)
          Yves Lafon (W3C)
          Priscilla Walmsley (W3C Invited Expert)

   Chair
          pauld

   Scribe
          pauld

Contents

     * Topics
     * Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________________

   wonders why the Agenda he sent didn't make it to the list ..

   discussion of validation service

   needs to accept a link

   hopefully it will work from a live version of the patterns.xml /
   stylesheet

   gcowe: now have CVS access, changed patterns and examples

   jonc: had some databinding issues around nillable, will review
   examples and look at tests
   ... sent mail on Microsoft and bare arrays:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2007Feb/000
   0.html
   ... had a similar request internally
   ... limitation of Siebel's modelling tool and repeated simple types

   pauld: is Siebel a toolkit we'd want to add to our testsuite?

   jonc: it's not a classic databinding, but does provide a mapping
   ... could be difficult to get a copy, but may be able to gain access
   to a BT development environment

   gcowe: Origo wouldn't go to these lengths as a work around, we'd get
   the vendor to fix the tool

   pauld: it's a classic case of why we're here - Origio is probably
   blissfully ignorant of Siebel, but may have customers who want to use
   it. BT has a strong relationship with Siebel, but still getting this
   kind of issue resolved in a timely fashion and for the version in
   production isn't seen as being as easy as changing the schema.

   pauld/jonc: this tool could be too bad for us to use as a reason to
   remove patterns

   jonc: BT developers also talk about "efficiency" in XSLT for wrapped
   arrays

   pauld: suspect that's the non-schema aware "perl" toolkit argument

   <scribe> ACTION: jcalladi to try to gain access to a Siebel dev
   environment [recorded in
   http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-databinding-minutes.html#action01]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-103 - Try to gain access to a Siebel dev
   environment [on Jonathan Calladine - due 2007-02-13].

   jonc: also been asking around about experience with maxOccurs>1 and
   not unbounded. No evidence it doesn't work, just not validated

   pauld: see you next week

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: jcalladi to try to gain access to a Siebel dev
   environment [recorded in
   http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-databinding-minutes.html#action01]

   [End of minutes]
     _________________________________________________________________
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 16:09:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:20:37 GMT