W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsd-databinding@w3.org > September 2006

Minutes: XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Telcon 19 September 2006

From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:17:49 +0100
Message-ID: <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC95225504BFEE16@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>

minutes from today's call are now available:

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html

and below for tracker's searching


   [1]W3C 

                                   - DRAFT -

                         Databinding WG Teleconference

19 Sep 2006

   [2]Agenda

   See also: [3]IRC log

Attendees

   Present
          Jon Calladine (BT)
          George Cowe (Origo)
          Paul Downey (BT)
          Otu Ekanem (BT)
          Yves Lafon (W3C)

   Regrets
   Chair
          pauld

   Scribe
          pauld

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]Administrivia
         2. [6]ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names
         3. [7]ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant
            schema
         4. [8]ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace
         5. [9]ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution
         6. [10]ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern
     * [11]Summary of Action Items
     _________________________________________________________________

Administrivia

   minutes from last week approved

   F2F planning - suggested hotel is full

   Jonc: have to drop off at 15:30

   George sends regrets for next week's call

   chair: let's go to ISSUE-10 and skip next week, then

ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names

   Jonc: presents background on rationalle for his text

   modified proposal from Jonc:
   [12]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep
   /0023.html

   pauld: where would this text go?

   jonc: you've pushed for maybe a primer or annotated companion to the
   document, not necessarily in our spec?

   pauld: less text may mean less comments, otoh good text may stave
   people making comments. This issue is contentious enough to get them
   anyway.

   pauld: so we've three proposals, and there are two parts: the
   normative constriction and the explanatory text.

   jonc: my latest proposal replaces the first one

   jonc: i'm ok with the constriction

   yves: mostly ok with constriction, but would also like to see the
   rational as non-normative text

   george: ok with the constriction

   yves: you might prefer readability and maintainance as opposed to
   interoperability, maybe this pattern should be a guideline, not
   normative?

   chair: so we're back to it being a "Design Consideration". I'm not
   hearing consensus. let's park this for a couple of weeks.

ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant schema

   pauld: still working on the report

   gcowe: working on the naming convention
   ... sent paul mail

   pauld: thanks, we need to move the ant forward, and the two-phase
   pattern detection

ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace

   pauld: did some testing on this:
   [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep
   /0022.html 

   <scribe> ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere
   [recorded in
   [14]http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]

   <trackbot> Created ACTION-66 - Test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere
   [on George Cowe - due 2006-09-26].

ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution

   <pauld> I can pick up ACTION-63 as business as usual

ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern

   pauld: came up with example for Chameleon Include - do we need a
   separate issue for this?

   [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep
   /0021.html 

   Is this a separate pattern, if so I'll open a separate issue for this?

   gcowe: we discussed making stand-alone schemas before, I can look into
   this

   pauld: we also need to double-check we have patterns for all our
   issues and examples for all our patterns, a script might help here.

Summary of Action Items

   [NEW] ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded
   in [16]http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]

   [End of minutes]
     _________________________________________________________________


    Minutes formatted by David Booth's [17]scribe.perl version 1.127
    ([18]CVS log)
    $Date: 2006/09/19 18:45:16 $

References

   1. http://www.w3.org/
   2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0020.html
   3. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-irc
   4. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#agenda
   5. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item00
   6. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item01
   7. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item02
   8. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item03
   9. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item05
  10. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#item06
  11. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/6/9/19-databinding-minutes.html#ActionSummary
  12. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0023.html
  13. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0022.html
  14. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01
  15. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0021.html
  16. http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01
  17. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
  18. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:17:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:20:37 GMT