I'd like to close ISSUE-10 today so we can make progress. My strong suspicion is that the pattern proposed earlier* based upon names in Python etc is going to provide the most interoperability with current databinding implementations, our criteria for a pattern to be "Basic". However, I recognise that we should go the extra mile to avoid disallowing i18n characters, especially since we are working within the W3C! I therefore propose we have at least two patterns, one to recognise simple names* for name="" and anothers to recognise more "interesting" names (unusual in terms of mainstream programming languages), I think we can use an XPath 2.0 match regex function to do this, and we have examples, here, which I'll add to our suite: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/testsuite/documents/names/names.xsd the "interesting" names can be more explicitly marked as "at risk" if required. Paul * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0007Received on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 14:57:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:22:09 GMT