Re: ISSUE-58: anonymous complexType

From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:00:03 +0100 Message-ID: <002e01c67e68$d2083690$0600a8c0@RW> To: "Databinding WG" <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org> · This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:20:37 GMT

Original Message From: "Databinding Issue Tracker" <dean+cgi@w3.org>

> We use the following pattern in our schemas:
> 
> <xs:element name="foo">
>  <xs:complexType>
>    <xs:sequence>
>      <xs:element .../>
>      <xs:element .../>
>    </xs:sequence>
>  <xs:complexType>
> </xs:element>

I wonder whether this should be a basic pattern?

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
                         for XML to C++ data binding visit
                         http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
                         (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================