W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsd-databinding@w3.org > February 2006

RE: ISSUE-19: Advice against using the \'all\' model group

From: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:41:21 -0800
To: paul.downey@bt.com
Cc: public-xsd-databinding@w3.org, public-xsd-databinding-request@w3.org, sandygao@ca.ibm.com
Message-Id: <OF25A26CF3.D47EA184-ON8825711D.008204A4-8825711D.00821F07@KP.ORG>

> > authors should think long and hard about using 1.0 all groups in the 
> > schemas simply because their expressivity is so limited...not because 
> > doing so will cause problems with any binding tool...right?
> 
> that's goes to the heart of the issue. Tools in general have little
> problem consuming 'all'. It's the restriction on how schema authors
> may then extend and use 'all' groups where the pain lies.

Well, if that's what you were getting at then I do not think it is 
appropriate to say anything about it in this spec.

pvb
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 23:44:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:20:36 GMT