> > authors should think long and hard about using 1.0 all groups in the > > schemas simply because their expressivity is so limited...not because > > doing so will cause problems with any binding tool...right? > > that's goes to the heart of the issue. Tools in general have little > problem consuming 'all'. It's the restriction on how schema authors > may then extend and use 'all' groups where the pain lies. Well, if that's what you were getting at then I do not think it is appropriate to say anything about it in this spec. pvbReceived on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 23:44:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:20:36 GMT