W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xsd-databinding@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Issue 8

From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:01:21 +0100
Message-ID: <004501c669e9$edff8440$0600a8c0@RW>
To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>, <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>

----- Original Message From: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
> Tony just let me know that PaulD. is still waiting for wording from me for
> Issue 8.  back in Feb, I posted my views on Issue 8 [1], which, to
> summarize, are that the WG should NOT issue any advice to schema authors
> to avoid pattern.  If the WG really wants to say something, it should
> instead, issue advice to tool implementors that they need to fully support
> the schema spec :-)  Seriously, tho, if the WG wants to say something to
> schema authors on this issue then I think someone who thinks that such
> adivce is a good thing should draft the wording.

To counter - ( "Is this the place for an argument?!" ) - I contend that it 
is not possible to implement this requirement in the general case.  I 
therefore think that those that advocate it should demonstrate how it can be 
realised in a practical way :-)

Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
                         for XML to C++ data binding visit
                         (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2006 11:01:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:12 UTC