- From: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@tech-know-ware.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:01:21 +0100
- To: <public-xsd-databinding@w3.org>, <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
----- Original Message From: <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
>
> Tony just let me know that PaulD. is still waiting for wording from me for
> Issue 8. back in Feb, I posted my views on Issue 8 [1], which, to
> summarize, are that the WG should NOT issue any advice to schema authors
> to avoid pattern. If the WG really wants to say something, it should
> instead, issue advice to tool implementors that they need to fully support
> the schema spec :-) Seriously, tho, if the WG wants to say something to
> schema authors on this issue then I think someone who thinks that such
> adivce is a good thing should draft the wording.
To counter - ( "Is this the place for an argument?!" ) - I contend that it
is not possible to implement this requirement in the general case. I
therefore think that those that advocate it should demonstrate how it can be
realised in a practical way :-)
Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
for XML to C++ data binding visit
http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
(or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2006 11:01:37 UTC