ISSUE-37: more than one way to express null, empty or missing content http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/databinding/issues/37 Raised by: Paul Downey On product: Basic This issue stems from the resolution of ISSUE-7, and ACTION-29. We provide several methods for expressing missing, null or empty content: - minOccurs="0" - nillable="true" - an empty string - possibly a null type pattern (dependent upon ISSUE-15) - others? what advice (design considerations) should we offer to select between these patterns. Does each pattern have different semantics?Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 13:40:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:20:37 GMT