- From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 16:44:22 -0400
- To: Xavier Franc <xfranc@online.fr>
- CC: Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>, public-xqts-comments@w3.org
Excellent - thanks for sending these Xavier! As you know, results like these really help us make the case that our specification should progress. I assume we can put these results on our public test results page? Jonathan Xavier Franc wrote: > Hello Jonathan, > > my apologies too for the delay in responding to you, this is not > retalation :-) > I was just waiting to be ready to provide results for the new version > Qizx 2.1 > which supports the XQuery Update Facility 1.0. > Pleas find attached these results. > > Concerning my previous remarks/questions, I completely understands > your reasons. > > best regards > Xavier > > Jonathan Robie wrote: >> >> Andrew Eisenberg wrote: >>> >>> > - it would be nice to have a zip distribution of the XQUF TS. >>> >>> I'll ask Jonathan to comment on this. >> >> First off, Xavier, my apologies, I just check and I see that I failed >> to respond to an earlier inquiry from you. >> >> So far, I've been resisting suggestions to create a zip distribution >> because most developers are able to use source code control systems, >> which are a better way to develop a test suite collaboratively, and I >> don't want to have to worry about whether a zip distribution is out >> of sync with the source code repository. If enough people give me a >> good reason that the source code control system does not work for >> them, I may change my mind, but I'm reluctant to provide a zip >> without a really good reason. >> >>> > - Is there a plan to publish a result page like for XQuery ? >>> >>> You'll find our early results in >>> http://dev.w3.org/2007/xquery-update-10-test-suite/results/. >> >> And your results would be very welcome. >> >> Jonathan >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 20:45:23 UTC