W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xqts-comments@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Remarks and questions about XQ Update Facility test suite

From: Xavier Franc <xfranc@online.fr>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 21:43:54 +0200
Message-ID: <48371E7A.3000806@online.fr>
To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>
CC: Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>, public-xqts-comments@w3.org
Hello Jonathan,

my apologies too for the delay in responding to you, this is not 
retalation :-)
I was just waiting to be ready to provide results for the new version 
Qizx 2.1
which supports the XQuery Update Facility 1.0.
Pleas find attached these results.

Concerning my previous remarks/questions, I completely understands your 
reasons.

best regards
Xavier

Jonathan Robie wrote:
>
> Andrew Eisenberg wrote:
>>
>> > - it would be nice to have a zip distribution of the XQUF TS.
>>
>> I'll ask Jonathan to comment on this.
>
> First off, Xavier, my apologies, I just check and I see that I failed 
> to respond to an earlier inquiry from you.
>
> So far, I've been resisting suggestions to create a zip distribution 
> because most developers are able to use source code control systems, 
> which are a better way to develop a test suite collaboratively, and I 
> don't want to have to worry about whether a zip distribution is out of 
> sync with the source code repository. If enough people give me a good 
> reason that the source code control system does not work for them, I 
> may change my mind, but I'm reluctant to provide a zip without a 
> really good reason.
>
>> > - Is there a plan to publish a result page like for XQuery ?
>>
>> You'll find our early results in 
>> http://dev.w3.org/2007/xquery-update-10-test-suite/results/.
>
> And your results would be very welcome.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>



Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 19:44:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 May 2008 19:44:49 GMT