W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xqts-comments@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Schema imports in MinimalConformance

From: Frans Englich <frans.englich@telia.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:39:53 +0000
To: Wolfgang Hoschek <wolfgang.hoschek@mac.com>
Cc: Xavier Franc <xfranc@online.fr>, public-xqts-comments@w3.org, Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <200607142339.54129.frans.englich@telia.com>

On Friday 14 July 2006 23:12, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote:
> What's the rationale for making a 1.0 release if it contains a long
> laundry list of known bugs, going back all the way to 0.8.0? (e.g.
> many unresolved whitespace issues, as of yesterday). 1.0 will be
> interpreted as a call for conformance, and I'd rather not conform to
> a buggy test suite. Why not call it 0.9.5? or 1.0-beta1?

Personally I think your comment has merit. Labeling it 0.9.5 is a whole 
different thing compared to 1.0, as outlined.

I can't comment on this as whole(because I don't have insight in the full 
scope, such as the impact of changing the road map and dead lines) so I'll 
leave this to Andrew for replying.

Thanks for asking "why?"!

(Personal response.)

Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 23:26:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:39:04 UTC