W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xqts-comments@w3.org > July 2006

Re: Schema imports in MinimalConformance

From: Frans Englich <englich@kde.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:12:48 +0000
To: Xavier Franc <xfranc@online.fr>
Cc: public-xqts-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <200607142312.48716.englich@kde.org>

On Thursday 13 July 2006 22:50, Xavier Franc wrote:
> Dear XQTS developers,
> There are still many "import schema" declarations in MinimalConformance
> tests (around 250, nearly 2%).

Yes, it seems to be this one:


> These tests will always fail with an implementation that does not
> support Schema:
> "If an XQuery implementation does not support the Schema Import Feature,
> it MUST raise a static error [err:XQST0009] if it encounters a schema
> import."
> IMHO those tests should be moved into the "Optional" part, rather than
> be adorned with an "expected-error" clause.
> I am looking forward to seeing this done in the 1.0 version.

Unfortunately I must say it's highly unlikely this will be fixed in 1.0. Yes, 
the issue has been open for long, and I would also very much like to see it 

The reason is that we(the test suite task force) have problem getting in 
contact with all our members. Vacations pokes holes in work flow this time of 

Hopefully, it will be fixed in a bug fix release that has been suggested to 
follow the 1.0 release.

> PS: I intentionally dont add a bug into bugzilla: I am not comfortable
> with this tool, and I think it is up to the
> XQTS developers to manage the bug database. Furthermore there are
> already several reports concerning this topic.

You are of course very welcome to use this list. Many find using the bug 
database practical. Let us know if there's any trouble you have so we can 
help, if you like. But again, you're welcome to use this list.

(Personal response.)


Received on Friday, 14 July 2006 23:00:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:39:04 UTC