W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xpointer-registry@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: formal issues raised by the smlxpath1 registration

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:44:52 +0000
To: Syd_Bauman@Brown.edu
Cc: public-xpointer-registry@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bbq58jlff.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Syd Bauman writes:

> KP> To be specific, it only allows xpath1 location paths
> KP> to be used. 
>
> OK. That alone seems different enough to me for a newly registered
> name.

With 20-20 hindsight, I _might_ have realised there was a difference
myself if the xpath1 scheme registration text said "The single
argument is an XPath Expr" rather than "The single argument is an
XPath path".  Would you consider updating the description to read that
way?

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH463EkjnJixAXWBoRArquAJoCETyq71aJ8VYoeY6yx84PBKu9HQCggDnO
5QuR50YqgVdWhP7FSy+EJDc=
=DiTY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 12:45:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 March 2008 12:45:38 GMT