W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xpointer-registry@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: New Xpointer scheme proposed: smlxpath1

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:18:45 +0000
To: public-xpointer-registry@w3.org
Cc: kumarp@microsoft.com
Message-ID: <f5bablk7s2i.fsf@hildegard.inf.ed.ac.uk>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Syd Bauman writes:

> How is this [smlxpath1] different than xpath1()?

The registrar invites discussion of this registration -- I am tending
towards rejecting it, on the grounds that it  unnecessarily duplicates
an existing scheme and would dilute the effectiveness of both the
existing scheme and the new scheme if it were allowed.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHxxclkjnJixAXWBoRApp0AJ4v/PsEgd3whNuASNGafzpLEkioyQCfcP0K
PZVDqQrV/kjur7Mh1sSCzL0=
=OddC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:18:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 28 February 2008 20:18:56 GMT