Re: proposed update to XML Encryption 1.1

Thanks for the quick replies Scott and Magnus, I've suggested the alternative change to Donald.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:13 PM, ext Cantor, Scott wrote:

>> Why not do this the other way around? We're close to publication, Eastlake's
>> document is still just a draft. He could easily switch.
> 
> I had some unimplemented constants defined that I think are still in released code, so I would favor that.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
>