- From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:09:01 +0000
- To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Why not do this the other way around? We're close to publication, Eastlake's document is still just a draft. He could easily switch. -- Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com] > Sent: 7 February, 2013 12:33 > To: public-xmlsec@w3.org > Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com > Subject: proposed update to XML Encryption 1.1 > > The PR draft of XML Encryption 1.1 defines informative URIs for AES Key > Wrap with Padding in Appendix A [1]. The update to RFC 4051 defines these > as well using different URIs [2]. > > I propose the URIs in XML Encryption 1.1 be updated to use those defined in > the RFC - as this is an informative appendix I see no harm in doing so to the > PR draft as we go to REC. > > Specifically, I propose changing > > http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#kw-aes-128-pad > > http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#kw-aes-192-pad > > http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#kw-aes-256-pad > > to > > http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#kw-aes128-pad > > http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#kw-aes192-pad > > http://www.w3.org/2007/05/xmldsig-more#kw-aes256-pad > > Comment or suggestions? > > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch, Nokia > Chair, W3C DAP Working Group > > [1] [http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core1/#sec-kw-aes-with-pad > > [2] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris/ > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:09:58 UTC