Updated 1.1 and 2.0 specs, added links to diffs

I have updated the 2.0 specifications to add redlines for all the Notes.

All, reminder please review the 1.1 and 2.0 publication drafts linked from the roadmap page

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Roadmap#Next_steps_for_XML_Security_1.1

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Roadmap#Next_steps_for_XML_Security_2.0

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Apr 9, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:

> I have created diff's for all the documents both Recommendation track and Notes as listed in the 1.1 section of the roadmap. WIll do the 2.0 specs in a bit.
> 
> Also added links to errata documents that I just created for the 1.1 Recommendations.
> 
> Fixed a bug in the Signature Functional Explanation.
> 
> For the recommendations, the redline from the previous rec is not very useful due to the number of changes - the linked functional explanation is probably more useful.
> 
> Did not update the Algorithms Cross reference doc as I suggested earlier, as I don't think those changes are useful at this point.
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 7:56 AM, ext Innovimax W3C wrote:
> 
>> Hi Frederick,
>> 
>> Is there a way to see the diff with previous documents ?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Mohamed
>> 
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:42 PM,  <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote:
>>> I have been preparing  the 1.1 Recommendations and associated Notes to publish this Thursday, assuming W3C Director approval. In conjunction with this I have also prepared to publish the 2.0 specifications as Working Group Notes.
>>> 
>>> I need your help to check for any errors, especially with examples, formatting, acknowledgements and the content of the abstracts and status sections.
>>> 
>>> I have completed validation, link, css, spell and pubrules checks for all of the drafts (though I might have missed something)
>>> 
>>> Links to the pre-publication drafts are on the roadmap page - please take a look at the drafts to see if you notice any errors or omissions.
>>> 
>>> 1.1 Publication drafts linked from here: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Roadmap#Next_steps_for_XML_Security_1.1
>>> 
>>> 2.0 Publication drafts linked from here: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Roadmap#Next_steps_for_XML_Security_2.0
>>> 
>>> Worth noting is that I believe I've carried the 1.1 XML Signature changes into 2.0, so the XML Signature 2.0 status section notes those changes. In addition, since XML Signature 2.0 is changing into a W3C Note, I updated the conformance section to add a paragraph noting the document is informative - please review that this change is adequate. I also changed the 2.0 abstracts to make it clear that the documents are informative.
>>> 
>>> You might also want to check the 2.0 Test Cases document to make sure the examples look right.
>>> 
>>> There may be a last minute update to the RFC 4051 reference in XML Signature 1.1 and XML Signature 2.0 depending on whether we obtain it from the iETF in time.
>>> 
>>> Please note Thomas and I have agreed to not publish updates to the interop documents, preferring to keep them as stable publications.
>>> 
>>> If you have any additional review comments to note formatting or pre-publication errors please post them to the public list by end of day tomorrow (apologies for tight deadline, draft preparation took way longer than I expected)
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> regards, Frederick
>>> 
>>> Frederick Hirsch
>>> Nokia
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Innovimax SARL
>> Consulting, Training & XML Development
>> 9, impasse des Orteaux
>> 75020 Paris
>> Tel : +33 9 52 475787
>> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
>> http://www.innovimax.fr
>> RCS Paris 488.018.631
>> SARL au capital de 10.000 €
>> 
> 

Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 19:17:43 UTC