# XML Security Working Group Teleconference ## 02 Oct 2012 [Agenda][3] See also: [IRC log][4] ## Attendees Present Frederick_Hirsch, Hal_Lockhart, Pratik_Datta, Bruce_Rich Regrets Chair Frederick_Hirsch Scribe fjh ## Contents * [Topics][5] 1. [Administrative: Agenda review, Announcements][6] 2. [Minutes Approval][7] 3. [PAG status][8] 4. [Last Call Publication planning][9] 5. [First Public Notes Status][10] 6. [1.1 Interop status][11] 7. [Action Review][12] 8. [Pending Actions][13] 9. [Other Business][14] 10. [Adjourn][15] * [Summary of Action Items][16] * * * Date: 02 October 2012 ScribeNick: fjh ### Administrative: Agenda review, Announcements fjh: I have no announcements ### Minutes Approval approve 25 September 2012 minutes [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- xmlsec/2012Sep/att-0033/minutes-2012-09-25.html][17] **RESOLUTION: Minutes from 25 September 2012 are approved.** ### PAG status fjh: Team delayed publication of PAG report for a week, I believe they intend to publish it this week. ### Last Call Publication planning fjh: Plan to publish 11 October, 3 weeks, contingent on PAG completion ... updated drafts for publication: XML Signature 1.1 : [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig- core-11/2012-10-LC/Overview.html][18] XML Encryption 1.1 : [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc- core-11/2012-10-LC/Overview.html][19] fjh: please review to see that they look ok, updated status section ... still need to fix links for PAG report (obviously) , still waiting on reference update git merge ... IPR exclusion period delay from end of LC to PR, I believe 60 days, see [http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-exclusion-with][20] ... need to find in process/ipr policy, not obvious in process document ### First Public Notes Status fjh: also plan to publish FPWD of Notes on 11 October, contingent on PAG completion ... updated drafts for publication Functional Changes XML Signature 1.1 [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts /xmldsig-core1-explain/FPWD/Overview.html][21] Functional Changes XML Encryption 1.1 [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts /xmlenc-core1-explain/FPWD/Overview.html][22] fjh: please review these as well plan to publish interop doc notes later ### 1.1 Interop status fjh: is interop done pdatta: yes we are done fjh: great, thanks ... done with test document? pdatta: done with interop test document fjh: ok, so I will merge test report and test documents ... after doing this will send message to list ACTION-913? ACTION-913 -- Frederick Hirsch to merge XML Encryption 1.1 test case document into XML Encryption 1.1 interop test result document, once Pratik concludes updating XML Encryption 1.1 test case document (ACTION-910) -- due 2012-09-25 -- OPEN ### Action Review ACTION-883? ACTION-883 -- Frederick Hirsch to review C14N 20 test cases document -- due 2012-04-10 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/883][23] fjh: On XML Coordination call yesterday I learned that canonicalization might be an issue for microXML ... I am not familiar with this work, but it might relate to 2.0, [http://www.w3.org/community/microxml/][24] ... potential issue with angle brackets in attribute values ... Regarding 2.0 in general suggestion that I send my message to xml-dev, [http://www.xml.org/xml-dev/][25] ... I will follow up on that ACTION-910? ACTION-910 -- Pratik Datta to update test cases document with new tests, [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- xmlsec/2012Sep/0020.html][26] -- due 2012-09-18 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/910][27] close ACTION-910 ACTION-910 Update test cases document with new tests, [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Sep/0020.html][26] closed ACTION-913? ACTION-913 -- Frederick Hirsch to merge XML Encryption 1.1 test case document into XML Encryption 1.1 interop test result document, once Pratik concludes updating XML Encryption 1.1 test case document (ACTION-910) -- due 2012-09-25 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/913][28] fjh: will do ACTION-916? ACTION-916 -- Frederick Hirsch to outline timeline for completing 1.1 Rec and share with XML Security WG and PAG -- due 2012-09-25 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/916][29] fjh: have been waiting for PAG to complete report publication to avoid confusion and rework ACTION-917? ACTION-917 -- Frederick Hirsch to prepare XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 for Last Call publication and make publication request -- due 2012-10-02 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/917][30] fjh: preparation done, waiting for git pull request to fix reference, PAG report to update status, and PAG report before making publication request ACTION-919? ACTION-919 -- Frederick Hirsch to prepare XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 functional explanation documents for publication -- due 2012-10-02 -- OPEN [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/919][31] close ACTION-919 ACTION-919 Prepare XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 functional explanation documents for publication closed ### Pending Actions ACTION-918? ACTION-918 -- Frederick Hirsch to prepare for FPWD publication of "XML Signature 1.1 Interop Test Report" and "XML Encryption 1.1 Interop Test Report" -- due 2012-10-02 -- PENDINGREVIEW [http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/918][32] close ACTION-918 ACTION-918 Prepare for FPWD publication of "XML Signature 1.1 Interop Test Report" and "XML Encryption 1.1 Interop Test Report" closed ### Other Business fjh: Once PAG report is published we plan to publish Last Call of XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 with 3 week review, as well as FPWD Note of the functional explanations for these two. ... Subsequently we will publish FPWD Notes of Interop Test Results of XML Signature 1.1 and XML Encryption 1.1 ... and following Last Call, submit XML Signature 1.1, XML Encryption 1.1 and XML Signature Properties for PR ... We will shift our focus to 2.0 once 1.1 is in the pipeline. Assuming no LC comments the 1.1 specs can progress to REC according to the process, not much needs to be done as interop is complete. no other business noted. ### Adjourn ## Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] * * * Minutes formatted by David Booth's [scribe.perl][33] version 1.135 ([CVS log][34]) $Date: 2009-03-02 03:52:20 $ [1]: http://www.w3.org/Icons/w3c_home [2]: http://www.w3.org/ [3]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Oct/0000.html [4]: http://www.w3.org/2012/10/02-xmlsec-irc [5]: #agenda [6]: #item01 [7]: #item02 [8]: #item03 [9]: #item04 [10]: #item05 [11]: #item06 [12]: #item07 [13]: #item08 [14]: #item09 [15]: #item10 [16]: #ActionSummary [17]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- xmlsec/2012Sep/att-0033/minutes-2012-09-25.html [18]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig- core-11/2012-10-LC/Overview.html [19]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc- core-11/2012-10-LC/Overview.html [20]: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-exclusion- with [21]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig- core1-explain/FPWD/Overview.html [22]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc- core1-explain/FPWD/Overview.html [23]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/883 [24]: http://www.w3.org/community/microxml/ [25]: http://www.xml.org/xml-dev/ [26]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2012Sep/0020.html [27]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/910 [28]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/913 [29]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/916 [30]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/917 [31]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/919 [32]: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/actions/918 [33]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [34]: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/