W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > July 2012

Re: Possible missing algorithms?

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 18:54:03 +0000
To: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DE3FE1A1-593F-42F3-8C0A-42F185B3C749@nokia.com>
This sounds like a bug in the spec - anyone else care to comment?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Jul 5, 2012, at 2:18 PM, ext Cantor, Scott wrote:

> In the vein of that AES-192 oversight, what is the status of RSA and ECDSA with SHA224?
> 
> I inherited some code that does define a URI constant for RSAw/SHA224, but I don't see it anywhere, so I'm wondering if it was a bug.
> 
> I also noted though that RFC 4051 does define a constant for ECDSA w/ 224, but it's not in the Sig 1.1 draft. Same goes for HMAC with 224 actually.
> 
> And I do see the latter two in the alg cross reference, so I'm thinking bug in Sig 1.1?
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 18:54:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 5 July 2012 18:54:39 GMT