W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > February 2012

RE: Key Derivation interop test results

From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:02:58 +0000
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "brich@us.ibm.com" <brich@us.ibm.com>
CC: "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D744D68428430B4F9C81DE8A4D5950681579877D@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
We tested against all IBM's vectors with a successful result.

-- Magnus

From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:00 PM
To: Magnus Nystrom; brich@us.ibm.com
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-xmlsec@w3.org
Subject: Key Derivation interop test results

We currently have the following on our interop wiki for "XML Encryption 1.1 Key Derivation using ConcatKDF and PBKDF2:

Test case 1: EncryptedData with content encryption key derived from shared secret. Key derivation method: ConcatKDF (http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#ConcatKDF).
Test case 2: EncryptedData with content encryption key derived from shared secret password. Key derivation method: PBKDF2 (http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#pbkdf2).
See test file directory<http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Group/interop/xmlenc11>

I believe this testing is complete and we can add the following statement to the wiki for these tests:

Interop status
* Partipants: IBM, Microsoft
* Each participant has verified all of these files.

Can you please confirm that it is correct and acceptable to add this statement?

Do we have any other XML Encryption 1.1 test results? I believe the answer is no.


regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 02:03:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:17 UTC