W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > February 2012

RE: Key Derivation interop test results

From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:02:58 +0000
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "brich@us.ibm.com" <brich@us.ibm.com>
CC: "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D744D68428430B4F9C81DE8A4D5950681579877D@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
We tested against all IBM's vectors with a successful result.

-- Magnus

From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:00 PM
To: Magnus Nystrom; brich@us.ibm.com
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-xmlsec@w3.org
Subject: Key Derivation interop test results

We currently have the following on our interop wiki for "XML Encryption 1.1 Key Derivation using ConcatKDF and PBKDF2:

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/wiki/Interop#XML_Encryption_1.1_Key_Derivation_using_ConcatKDF_and_PBKDF2
[[
Test case 1: EncryptedData with content encryption key derived from shared secret. Key derivation method: ConcatKDF (http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#ConcatKDF).
Test case 2: EncryptedData with content encryption key derived from shared secret password. Key derivation method: PBKDF2 (http://www.w3.org/2009/xmlenc11#pbkdf2).
See test file directory<http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Group/interop/xmlenc11>
]]

I believe this testing is complete and we can add the following statement to the wiki for these tests:

[[
Interop status
* Partipants: IBM, Microsoft
* Each participant has verified all of these files.
]]

Can you please confirm that it is correct and acceptable to add this statement?

Do we have any other XML Encryption 1.1 test results? I believe the answer is no.

Thanks

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 02:03:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:17 UTC