- From: Cantor, Scott <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 18:28:20 +0000
- To: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
On 9/2/11 11:16 PM, "MURATA Makoto" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> wrote: >Dear colleagues, > >I still do not understand. The revised gh-example.xml still contains ><dsig11:ECKeyValue>...</dsig11:ECKeyValue>. > >If Encryption 1.1 does not normatively reference Signature 1.1, >conformant implementations are not required to handle this subtree >as specified in Signature 1.1. This: http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-xmlenc-core1-20110303/ includes a normative reference to XML Signature 1.1. So what are you looking at? -- Scott
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 18:29:06 UTC