W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2011

RE: Updated (v2) proposed XML Encryption 1.1 changes related to OAEP

From: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 05:33:15 +0000
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D744D68428430B4F9C81DE8A4D59506812181DA1@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Frederick, looks good to me but can you just add an attribute (even if optional) to the existing xenc: schema (even if the attribute itself is defined in xenc11)?

-- Magnus

From: public-xmlsec-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xmlsec-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 10:15 AM
To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
Subject: Updated (v2) proposed XML Encryption 1.1 changes related to OAEP

Attached is updated (V2) clean and redline proposed XML Encryption 1.1 changes.

Shifted from using "Label" to "PSourceAlgorithm"

Corrected EncryptionMethod to be in xenc: namespace

Updated Algorithm Identifiers and Implementation Requriements to list two URIs for RSA-OAEP, with required for original - added note " (including MGF1 with SHA1) "
and new URI for version that allows specification of MGF (optional)

Added sentence to 3.2 that MGF attribute is in xenc11 namespace

Cleaned up 5.5.2 to better explain two URIs and parameters use and defaults

Please review and indicate if this is acceptable, if so I'll update the draft.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 05:33:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 7 October 2011 05:33:54 GMT