W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2011

RE: [widgets] W3C Widgets Digital Signatures implementer feedback

From: Cantor, Scott E. <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:28:34 +0000
To: "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-xmlsec@w3.org" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7EE86E89365CA94F8E7B8251F926071006C2E0@CIO-KRC-D1MBX01.osuad.osu.edu>
> If you have implementation experience or comment you might wish to
> respond on the public-webapps list.

Would we as a WG want to say that the better choice to switch to is Exclusive? Aren't we removing the inclusive semantics from 2.0? Seems like telling people to bake in support for Inclusive (either version) might be counter-productive.

-- Scott
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:29:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 January 2011 16:29:15 GMT