W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2011


From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:50:16 +0100
Message-Id: <5652F731-E532-498B-8803-5068E2CA2E12@w3.org>
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
To: public-xmlsec@w3.org
The latest definition of CURIEs is in the RDFa 1.1 Core Working Draft:

My understanding is that CURIEs do not use XML namespaces at all, and instead have their own prefix binding mechanism using a @prefix attribute.  That attribute, in turn, comes without a namespace, and it therefore depends on the host language whether it is actually used for RDFa, or if a @prefix attribute that's encountered means something else altogether.

After discussion with Ivan, our conclusion was that we shouldn't bother with CURIEs in XML Signature 2.0.

(ACTION-760, ACTION-761)

Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 10:50:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:15 UTC