W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Importing 1.0 while normatively referencing 1.1

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:51:20 +0000
To: <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
CC: <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2F5FFC43-A143-4D47-9F80-0F4F250BD2AB@nokia.com>
It sounds like we need a correction to xenc-schema11.xsd here

Does anyone disagree?

I have entered this comment as LC-2544, http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42458/WD-xmlenc-core1-20100513/2544

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Aug 15, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:

> [repost to xml security public list] 
> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> Resent-From: <xml-encryption@w3.org>
>> From: ext MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
>> Date: August 12, 2011 4:06:49 AM EDT
>> To: xml-encryption <xml-encryption@w3.org>
>> Subject: Importing 1.0 while normatively referencing 1.1
>> 
>> xenc-schema-11.xsd does not import xmldsig11-schema.xsd but
>> rather import xmldsigschema.xsd.  However, XML Encryption 1.1
>> normatively references to XML Signature 1.1 rather than 1.0.
>> Which is correct?
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
>> 
>> Makoto
>> 
>> 
> 
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 15:52:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:16 UTC