W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2010

RE: Updates to XML signature 2.0

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:28:26 -0400
To: "'Pratik Datta'" <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <008c01cb76b4$c3cca270$4b65e750$@osu.edu>
> To be consistent with the C14n2.0 spec, which also defines these same two
> elements, plus an additional element called "Element"
> <c14n2:QNameAware>
>     <c14n2:Element Name="..." NS="..."/>
>     <c14n2:QualifiedAttr Name="..." NS="..."/>
>     <c14n2:UnqualifiedAttr Name="..." ParentName="..." ParentNS="..."/>
> </c14n2:QNameAware>
> This is a little strange, having the exact same element with the same
> semantics in two different namespaces. But I guess putting a dependency of
> one over the other would be even worse.

Actually I think it is more confusing this way, I would suggest just using
the original names. What do others think?

-- Scott
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 15:28:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:14 UTC