- From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:28:26 -0400
- To: "'Pratik Datta'" <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
> To be consistent with the C14n2.0 spec, which also defines these same two > elements, plus an additional element called "Element" > > <c14n2:QNameAware> > <c14n2:Element Name="..." NS="..."/> > <c14n2:QualifiedAttr Name="..." NS="..."/> > <c14n2:UnqualifiedAttr Name="..." ParentName="..." ParentNS="..."/> > </c14n2:QNameAware> > > This is a little strange, having the exact same element with the same > semantics in two different namespaces. But I guess putting a dependency of > one over the other would be even worse. Actually I think it is more confusing this way, I would suggest just using the original names. What do others think? -- Scott
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 15:28:48 UTC