W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > October 2010

Re: LC comment on XML Signature 1.1 ( LC-2424)

From: <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 23:49:36 +0000
To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Cc: public-xmlsec@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1P1pM8-0007KU-43@jessica.w3.org>

 Dear Scott Cantor ,

The XML Security Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on
the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing
Version 1.1 published on 4 Feb 2010. Thank you for having taken the time to
review the document and to send us comments!

The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.

Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
public-xmlsec@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 8 October 2010. In
case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for
or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot
be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection
which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this
document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.


For the XML Security Working Group,
Thomas Roessler
W3C Staff Contact

 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/008801cb5f1f$354c0330$9fe40990$@osu.edu
 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xmldsig-core1-20100204/


Your comment on 4.5.4 The X509Data Element:
> Due to the ongoing problems with the X509IssuerSerial element, I would
> ask
> that a new X509Data alternative for representing certificates uniquely
> by
> hash be added to the 1.1 schema and specification, per the suggested
> changes
> here:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Sep/0052.html

Working Group Resolution (LC-2424):
RESOLUTION: group accepts scantor's proposal, to change both 1.1 and 2.0

Updated XML SIgnature 1.1 draft, schema and RELAX NG Schema.

Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 23:49:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:14 UTC