- From: Pratik Datta <PRATIK.DATTA@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:25:06 -0800 (PST)
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-xmlsec@w3.org Public List" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
We are ready to coin a URI. I am ok with what you proposed i.e. "http://www.w3.org/2010/xml-c14n2" What do you think of the current new Transform model URI "http://www.w3.org/2010/xmlsec/xmldsig2#newTransformModel" Pratik -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:tlr@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:00 AM To: Pratik Datta Cc: Thomas Roessler; public-xmlsec@w3.org Public List Subject: algorithm URIs Pratik, I didn't want us to descend into bikeshedding the URIs on the call. ;-) I'd prefer to avoid /2010/xmlsec as a part of the namespace, and keep those URIs short. Therefore, I suggest that -- if we think we're ready to coin a URI for C14N 2.0 -- that should be /2010/xml-c14n2. If we don't think we're ready yet to coin a URI, we should use /2008/xmlsec/experimental#c14n2 or something like that; we had allocated /2008/xmlsec/experimental for experimental identifiers. See the list of namespaces here: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/namespaces.html Let me know what you think. Thanks, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 2 March 2010 16:27:15 UTC