W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Updating RNG Schemas for XML Security: KeyInfoReference, Encryption, Generic Hybrid Ciphers

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 12:20:46 -0500
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, Makoto MURATA <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "XMLSec WG Public List (public-xmlsec@w3.org)" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <DE1C7169-2B9F-4C11-BE7C-1F835DAA8685@nokia.com>
To: ext Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
Magnus

Thanks for the reminder, about the errata, sharing with Makoto directly

E03 2003-11-18 (Error)The XML Encryption schema is missing the  
definition of DHKeyValue that is in the natural language  
specification. The schema should be corrected by adding the DHKeyValue  
element and DHKeyValueType structure from the specification as  
children of the schema element.

http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2002/12-xmlenc-errata

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Mar 1, 2010, at 11:56 AM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote:

> This is a known issue with XML Encryption 1.0 (see http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2002/12-xmlenc-errata)
>
> -- Magnus
>
>>> From: "ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
>>> Date: February 28, 2010 9:09:58 PM EST
>>> To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Updating RNG Schemas for XML Security:
>>> KeyInfoReference, Encryption, Generic Hybrid Ciphers
>>>
>>> Frederick,
>>>
>>> I am confused by the schema files of XML encryption.
>>>
>>> First, the URI for xenc-schema11.xsd and that for xenc-schema.xsd
>>> shown in
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/ 
>>> Overview.htm#sec-
>> x
>>> sdSchema are identical.  Where is xenc-schema11.xsd?  I tried
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/xenc- 
>>> schema11.xsd
>>> but this returns 404.
>>>
>>> Second, http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/xenc-
>> schema.xsd
>>> and http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core/xenc-schema.xsd are different:
>>> the
>>> former has DHKeyValue but the latter does not.   Is this  
>>> intentional?
>
>
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 17:21:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 March 2010 17:21:28 GMT