W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Regarding ACTION-528 (ISSUE-188)

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@Nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:00:52 -0500
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@Nokia.com>, Makoto MURATA <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "XMLSec WG Public List (public-xmlsec@w3.org)" <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <69778348-CFA3-42E8-84B4-F247B9E28284@nokia.com>
To: ext Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>
I have just updated XML Encryption to fix the link to the 1.1 schema.  
Can you please confirm I got this right?

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Mar 1, 2010, at 12:09 AM, ext Magnus Nystrom wrote:

> Dear all,
> This is in response to ACTION-528 that was assigned to me during  
> this week’s call.
>
> I reviewed the latest XML DSig draft and the latest XML Enc draft. I  
> am not sure when the text in Section 4.5.8 of XML DSig 1.1 got  
> added, but it is, as Frederick noticed, clearly not correct. I  
> suggest a change to:
>
> “
> 4.5.8 XML Encryption EncryptedKey and DerivedKey Elements
> The <xenc:EncryptedKey> and <xenc11:DerivedKey> elements defined in  
> [XMLENC-CORE1] as children ofds:KeyInfo can be used to convey in- 
> band encrypted or derived key material. In particular, the  
> <xenc:DerivedKey> element may be present when the key used in  
> calculating a Message Authentication Code is derived from a shared  
> secret.
> “
>
> Also, I noted that the current draft of XML Enc 1.1 (at http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/)
> does not link to the 1.1 schema (of which I found one copy at: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/xenc-schema-11.xsd) 
> , but rather twice to the 1.0 schema (at http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/xenc-schema.xsd)
>
> -- Magnus
>
Received on Monday, 1 March 2010 13:01:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 1 March 2010 13:01:36 GMT