W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Proposal for C14N xmlAncestors flag

From: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:42:47 +0200
To: <cantor.2@osu.edu>
CC: <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4E0FE4A3-ED0B-483E-AB25-41C561F18BF7@nokia.com>
To agree with Scott, we probably do not need to be backward compatible in 2.0 mode but do need to be clear in the spec about backward compatibility using "compatibility mode".

Any backward compatibility option in 2.0 mode probably requires a strong justification.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Jun 8, 2010, at 1:56 AM, ext Scott Cantor wrote:

>> I remember that we had discussed this, but did we agree on this proposal ?
> 
> I think Thomas had expressed a concern about whether we needed to bother
> exposing all of the backward compatibility options, and that it was better
> to define just "the right things" for 2.0.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2010 11:43:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 June 2010 11:43:48 GMT