RE: Object tag in Dsig 2.0

> My proposal:
> 
> The <Object> tag is meant for Enveloping signatures, where the user wants
to
> put the data to be signed inside the <Signature> itself.  There are three
> subcases for this.
> 
> a) The data to be signed is a single XML subtree, and it is present as a
> child of the <Object>.  The subtree has an ID, and the <Reference> uses
this
> ID to look up this subtree, no transforms are used.  This is the simple
use
> case, I propose that we only support this one in 2.0.

Presumably it doesn't have to be by ID? I think you're just saying "we
support referencing an Object element or its content in the same manner
you'd reference anything else, nothing to see here, move along".

-- Scott

Received on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 18:48:26 UTC