W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2010

XML Security RNG Schemas and WG1 review

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:53:00 -0500
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>, "adjb@adjb.net" <adjb@adjb.net>
Message-Id: <62406B05-9E3A-47A3-8128-AC966B8336B4@nokia.com>
To: ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Makoto

This is great news, and the XML Security WG welcomes this review and  
all the help we can get to make the RNG Schemas as good and complete  
as possible.

We plan to publish a First Public Working Draft of the XML RNG Schemas  
document next week, 4 February, you can see the current draft at

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlsec-rngschema/Overview.html

You will note that the draft currently only references the xmldsig- 
core-schema.rnc, xmldsig11-schema.rnc and any-containing-xmldsig11.rnc
for XML Signature 1.1. It also only references xmldsig-properties- 
schema.rnc and any-containing-xmldsig11-properties.rnc for XML  
Signature Properties.

It does not directly reference allowAny.rnc, allowAny11.rnc,  
allowAnyForeign.rnc allowAnyForeign11.rnc, any-containing-xmldsign.rnc  
or exclusiveC14N.rnc. I'm not sure if or how these should be mentioned  
in the document, so that is something to consider adding for a  
revision before WG1 review. For example, we might want a new section  
for Exclusive Canonicalization.

I also think it would be helpful if you could please provide schemas  
for XML Encryption 1.1 and Generic Hybrid Cipher before WG1 review as  
well. Then we may have a complete document.

We might also wish to discuss later what we might need to do with  
regards to XML Signature 2.0.

Thank you very much, this is a great help.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
Chair XML Security WG



On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:05 AM, ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

> Frederick,
>
>> To this end I've make a separate "XML Security RELAXNG Schemas" draft
>> (to become a W3C Note) but so that it is found have referenced it  
>> from
>> the other documents.
>
> I spoke with Alex Brown, the convenor of SC34/WG1 (DSDL).  WG1 is now
> responsible for RELAX NG.  WG1 plans to review the "XML Security  
> RELAXNG
> Schemas" draft in a F2F meeting in March, and will send your WG an
> official comment.  I will personally try to  revise schemas and  
> provide
> schemas for XML encryption very soon.
>
> Recently, WG1 has tried to assist W3C in developing RELAX NG schemas
> for W3C specifications.
>
> 1) WG1 has recently reviewed the RELAX NG schema for XForms 1.1  The
> review is available at:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2009Dec/0007.html
>
> 2) Mohamed Zergaoui recently proposed a RELAX NG schema for WebCGM2.1.
> He is a liaison between W3C and SC34.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2010Jan/0003.html
>
> 3) SVG 1.2 Tiny has a RELAX NG schema from the beginning.   WG1  
> plans to
> review it.
>
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/1.2/rng/Tiny-1.2/
>
> Cheers,
>
> Cheers,
> Makoto
>
Received on Friday, 29 January 2010 22:53:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 29 January 2010 22:53:48 GMT