W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2010

Signature 1.1: CharTwoFieldParamsType (Re: ACTION-492: Compare XML Schema fragments and file)

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:02:57 +0100
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, XML Security Working Group WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C9B114A1-4CA6-41FD-BBE8-F10BBED2EB23@w3.org>
To: Magnus Nystrom <mnystrom@microsoft.com>, Brian LaMacchia <bal@exchange.microsoft.com>
Going through Signature 1.1 in order to iron out minor editorial kinks, I realize that this not-so-minor issue apparently didn't get resolved, yet:

> - The standalone schema has CharTwoFieldParamsType defined with two elements "M" and "W"; the snippet in the spec has "M" only.  Which one's right?


Somebody with actual knowledge of EC crypto, please advise.

Thanks,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>







On 12 Jan 2010, at 18:34, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> A quick review leads to the following:
> 
> - The order of choices in FieldIDType is different. Doesn't matter.
> - The standalone schema has CharTwoFieldParamsType defined with two elements "M" and "W"; the snippet in the spec has "M" only.  Which one's right?
> - The schema snippet for DEREncodedKeyValue misses the XML comment identifying the target name space that we've used for other schema snippets.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:03:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 January 2010 23:03:07 GMT