W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2010

Re: RNG schema plans

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:27:38 -0500
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <76D17425-63F2-4D25-BFE6-01CC3F5CE122@nokia.com>
To: "ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
I changed

include "xmldsig11-schema.rnc"
include "allowAnyForeign11.rnc"


include "../xmldsig-core-11/xmldsig11-schema.rnc"
include "../xmldsig-core-11/allowAnyForeign11.rnc"

simply to deal with the fact that Signature Properties is in  a  
different directory than Signature 1.1

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Jan 19, 2010, at 9:17 AM, ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

>> I modified the SIgnature Properties driver schema to refer using
>> relative paths to the included schemas from xmldsig-core-11, and was
>> able to validate sp-example.xml.
> Do you mean that you modified (or even removed) any-containing- 
> xmldsig11-properties.rnc
> and move the include statement, namely 'include "xmldsig-properties- 
> schema.rnc"  ',
> to "xmldsig-core-schema.rnc" or "xmldsig11-schema.rnc"?  If signature
> properties should always be allowed, this change makes a lot of sense.
> Cheers,
> Makoto
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 14:28:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:13 UTC