W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2010

Re: RNG schema plans

From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:59:34 -0500
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <60AA561F-C694-4B29-A860-72767960B783@nokia.com>
To: "ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
Much thanks to Makoto for a quick revision to the RNC schemas.

I've checked the changes into CVS, and updated the Signature  
Properties draft to also refer to the appropriate driver schema.

I modified the SIgnature Properties driver schema to refer using  
relative paths to the included schemas from xmldsig-core-11, and was  
able to validate sp-example.xml.

I agree with what Makoto says below, to the benefits of keeping the  
RNG schema within the documents, however this will mean that changes  
are not easy once we progress the document to Last Call and beyond.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

On Jan 19, 2010, at 7:03 AM, ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

> While writing RELAX NG schemas for XML digital signature, I have
> encountered unclear points in the specification.  In particular,
> where the XSD schema simply provides xsd:any, the spec is
> not clear enough.
> Although I do not think that such a separate document for RELAX NG
> causes any problems to RELAX NG users, I still think that
> RELAX NG schemas as part of your specs force careful reviews and
> are thus useful.
> Cheers,
> Makoto
Received on Tuesday, 19 January 2010 13:00:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:13 UTC