RE: ACTION-638: high level reorg suggestions

Just an update on my edits, I'm doing a large editorial pass over the dsig-2.0 spec while I make these larger changes; there are a lot of inconsistencies and some section numbering that's off, so it's taking a while. I hope to have it done by next week.

As an aside, these hardcoded section numbers in references are obviously a problem for maintenance. Is there some way with this format to reference sections by their ID?

-- Scott

Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 17:10:34 UTC