W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > August 2010

RE: ACTION-549: Proposal for QName handling in C14N 2.0

From: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 15:47:24 -0400
To: "'Pratik Datta'" <pratik.datta@oracle.com>, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Cc: <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00e201cb3732$860c32f0$922498d0$@osu.edu>

> One thing though the QNameAware parameter is very verbose.

Yes, a compact notation would reintroduce prefixes and would thus be
QName-valued itself.

-- Scott

Received on Sunday, 8 August 2010 19:47:57 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com: "Agenda - Distributed Meeting 2010-08-10"
Previous message: Thomas Roessler: "Fwd: Planning for EXI review of XML Encryption 1.1 Last Call (ACTION-585)"
In reply to: Pratik Datta: "RE: ACTION-549: Proposal for QName handling in C14N 2.0"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 8 August 2010 19:47:58 GMT