Re: Transforms for XML Encryption - propose to close ISSUE-135

I meant that it doesn't make sense to apply transformations in the  
case of CipherReference

s/without/with/

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:

> re ISSUE-135 - review transforms for XML Encryption
>
> I think this issue is to see if the CipherReference requires
> transforms [1]:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview.htm#sec-CipherReference
>
> Given that the purpose of the CipherReference is to obtain the
> encrypted octets, it doesn't seem useful to produce them without
> transformation.
>
>  I suggest we close this ISSUE with no action unless someone has
> another suggestion, the resolution being that there is no need for
> change.
>
> regards, Frederick
>
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2009Jun/att-0051/09-xmlsec-minutes.html#item07
>
>

Received on Monday, 28 September 2009 19:09:31 UTC