W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > September 2009

RE: Clarifying XPath Filtering Transform text (pertains to Action-350, etc.)

From: Ed Simon <edsimon@xmlsec.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:56:26 -0400
To: Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Cc: 'Frederick Hirsch' <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, 'XMLSec WG Public List' <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1253303786.3413.29.camel@XMLSEC-BIZ.phub.net.cable.rogers.com>
Indeed, my main concern is the "nasty stuff" and as Scott says, that is
going to take some work (and time) to figure out.


On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 15:23 -0400, Scott Cantor wrote:
> Ed Simon wrote on 2009-09-18:
> > No, I do not have the level of understanding I would need. Beginning to
> > get that level will require some discussion during our next telecon.
> I think I could write the text, but I need to know what part of c14n 1.1 is
> throwing this off. I definitely agree about that misplaced comma and being
> clear that arbitrary node sets != well-formed XML subtrees. Other than that,
> I was led to believe that any time you get a node set, you do each node one
> after the other and that's that. They just get concatenated, I think.
> The other issue I think you had was that the examples didn't include any of
> the nasty stuff. Probably true, but would take some work to fix, and since
> we aren't expecting to produce a new version of c14n 1.x at this point, is
> that in scope to do?
> -- Scott
Received on Friday, 18 September 2009 19:57:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:12 UTC