W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Transform Note Design Decisions

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:34:25 +0100
Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F53F448B-69FF-4097-B63A-3782BF80201F@w3.org>
To: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
Hi Pratik,

I agree with most of your high-level points, therefore I don't repeat  
them here. ;-)

On 25 Mar 2009, at 18:23, Pratik Datta wrote:

> Thomas, regarding your nodeset question, I have been also trying to  
> think of an different model  to represent a document subset - the  
> event stream is a popular model in streaming parsers, but maybe we  
> need to define our own model.


I'd like to understand whether we can use an event stream (as  
specified where?) or whether we'd need to define a separate model.  My  
sense is that having that framework will go a long way toward  
understanding what your proposal means in terms of analysis and  
implementation complexity.

Therefore, if you could shed some more light on that point, that would  
be most welcome.

Thanks,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 27 March 2009 16:34:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:57 GMT