Reworked proposal follows. The element name is appropriate, but admittedly might be a little confusing because of overlap with "KeyInfo". ----- <complexType name="SubjectPublicKeyInfoType"> <simpleContent> <extension base="base64Binary"> <attribute name="Id" type="ID" use="optional"/> </extension> </simpleContent> </complexType> <element name="SubjectPublicKeyInfo" type="ds11:SubjectPublicKeyInfoType"/> ---- 4.4.3 The SubjectPublicKeyInfo Element Identifier Type="http://www.w3.org/2008/01/xmldsig# SubjectPublicKeyInfo" (this can be used within a RetrievalMethod or Reference element to identify the referent's type) The public key algorithm and value are DER-encoded in accordance with the value that would be used in the Subject Public Key Info field of an X.509 certificate, per section 4.1.2.7 of [RFC5280]. The DER-encoded value is then base64-encoded. For example, RSA and DSA keys are encoded as described by section 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 of [RFC3279]. Schema Definition: (see above) -- ScottReceived on Sunday, 22 March 2009 21:06:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:57 GMT