W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > March 2009

Exclusive C14N

From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:10:04 -0500
To: XMLSec WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-id: <49B19F3C.3070808@sun.com>
I vaguely recall discussing this before, but is there a good reason why 
exclusive C14N is recommended and not required in the XML Signature 1.1 draft?

--Sean
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 22:10:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:57 GMT