W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > March 2009

Exclusive C14N

From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:10:04 -0500
To: XMLSec WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-id: <49B19F3C.3070808@sun.com>

I vaguely recall discussing this before, but is there a good reason why 
exclusive C14N is recommended and not required in the XML Signature 1.1 draft?

--Sean

Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 22:10:42 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: XML Security Working Group Issue Tracker: "ISSUE-108: exclusive C14N is recommended and not required in the XML Signature 1.1 [v11]"
Previous message: Sean Mullan: "(XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 1.1) Some Algorithm URIs have extra spaces"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 March 2009 22:10:43 GMT