Propose we close the following issues

Given our recent work, I believe the following issues can be closed.  
Am I correct, especially regarding the schema? Please note on the list  
before Tuesday's call if you believe any of these issues are still  
open. Gerald, I assume you are looking at the less obvious issues more  
carefully in your action.

1) [OPEN] ISSUE-105 : HMAC output length is defined on bits base64 on  
octets
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/105

Resolution:
Recent edits to clarify HMAC padding, ACTION-320
ACTION-320 -- Brian LaMacchia to draft language for HMAC section,  
6.3.1 -- due 2009-06-23 -- CLOSED

2) [OPEN] ISSUE-67 : Revise XSLT transform; it's currently octet- 
stream to node-set.
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/67

Resolution:
clarified input and output in XML Signature 1.1
Not to be encouraged in 2.0

3) [OPEN] ISSUE-128 : Add clarification in XML Signature regarding  
serialization impact with issue:: add clarification in XML Signature  
regarding serialization impact with
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/128

Resolution:
Added note to XML Signature 1.1
ACTION-289 -- Frederick Hirsch to propose text on serialization issue  
for xml signature 1.1 -- due 2009-05-20 -- CLOSED

4) [OPEN] ISSUE-126 : Clarify XMLENC Section 5.8 (Message  
Authentication)
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/126

Resolution:
Removed section entirely
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/explain.html

5) [OPEN] ISSUE-133 : Update Exclusive C14N Schema ; on [Errata-C14N]
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/133


Errata and new schema, see Resolutions in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/14-xmlsec-minutes.html#item10

6) [OPEN] ISSUE-110 : Need better definition for "visibly utilizes" in  
Exc-C14N ; on [Maint-ExC14N (Exclusive XML Canonicalization Version  
1.0 Maintenance)]

http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/110

Resolved with acceptance of errata E07

http://www.w3.org/2009/07/14-xmlsec-minutes.html#item10

7) ISSUE-133 -- Update Exclusive C14N Schema -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/133

Resolution
resolved with acceptance of revised schema, see Resolutions in http://www.w3.org/2009/07/14-xmlsec-minutes.html#item10
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/133

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia