W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2009

Re: new xmldsig redline

From: Sean Mullan <Sean.Mullan@Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:24:02 -0500
To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Message-id: <497F1902.5070501@sun.com>

A minor comment, but we should change the examples in the beginning of the 
document to use (proposed) required algorithms, for example rsa-sha256 instead 
of dsa-sha1.

--Sean

Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> 
> I've generated a new XML Signature redline to reflect the changes Brian 
> made recently:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview_diff.htm
> 
> The latest XML Encryption redline is at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/Overview_diff.htm
> 
> Brian, All: Please review to check the changes.
> 
> Can anyone please help with reviewing/validating the associated schema 
> files?
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/xmldsig-ecc.xsd
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/xenc-schema-11.xsd
> 
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch, Nokia
> Chair XML Security WG
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:24:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:57 GMT