W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > January 2009

Re: ISSUE-91: ECC can't be REQUIRED

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:04:58 +0100
Message-Id: <A154DBAF-E9D3-4F74-9859-03CCC8849D26@w3.org>
To: XML Security Working Group WG <public-xmlsec@w3.org>

On 26 Jan 2009, at 20:24, XML Security Working Group Issue Tracker  
wrote:

> ISSUE-91: ECC can't be REQUIRED
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/track/issues/91
>
> Raised by: Bruce Rich
> On product:
>
> The XML Sig 1.1 and XML Enc 1.1 drafts currently identify the ECC  
> algorithms as REQUIRED. Given the instructions in Section 2 of the  
> following W3C policy, http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/ 
>  , we need to weaken the ECC statements to OPTIONAL, at least until  
> such time as RF status is reached for these algorithms.

I strongly recommend against us spending tomorrow's call on an attempt  
to parse the patent policy. I'd be happy to organize a briefing with  
W3C's legal counsel for some future meeting, but would hope that we  
don't need to stall an FPWD on that.

--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 21:05:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:57 GMT