W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > February 2009

Re: Proposed changes for properties document

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:50:01 +0100
To: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Message-Id: <C4F617D3-0343-4E71-85C2-4E63E4EDCE17@w3.org>
Cc: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
On 18 Feb 2009, at 00:27, Frederick Hirsch wrote:

> Thanks for these suggested changes. By timezoned I assume you mean  
> times must be expressed in UTC, if so would it be more obvious to  
> state that times must be expressed as UTC (although timezoned is  
> clear in conjunction with schema reference).

Since the time zone mechanism for dateTime expressions can do without  
reference to some external database, I don't think we need to impose  

The main point here is that schema defines two different time scales,  
and that comparison of an untimezoned and a timezoned value isn't well- 

(While I like the fact that every noun can be verbed in English, I  
have to say that "timezoned" and "untimezoned" sound awful.)
Received on Tuesday, 17 February 2009 23:50:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:10 UTC