W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > August 2009

Fwd: The RELAX NG schema for XML-Signature

From: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:23:17 -0400
Cc: Frederick Hirsch <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
Message-Id: <33B68255-62A0-4B51-8D46-99A7DE42C3A7@nokia.com>
To: XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Forwarded, with permission. Contains revised RNG schema.

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "ext MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)" <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> Date: August 31, 2009 11:05:45 AM EDT
> To: "Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston)" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>
> Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, Murata <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
> Subject: Re: The RELAX NG schema for XML-Signature
> Frederick,
> Yes, please feel free to forward my mails to the xml security wg  
> public
> list.  But I have significantly improved the schemas.
> xmldsig-core-schema.rnc is derived from xmldsig-core-schema.xsd, but
> it is quite different from the original.  First, this schema does not
> allow any element via wildcards.  Rather, it is expected to be
> customized for each top-level schema.  Second, this schema explicitly
> specifies each combination of the Algorithm attribute, and the
> permissible child elements.
> any-containing-xmldsig.rnc is a top-level schema, which invokes
> xmldsig-core-schema.rnc.  Any correct use of XML digital signature
> is expected be valid against this top-level schema.
> I have tried to create a schema for another special case, namely
> the combination of OOXML OPC and xmldsig.  However, I first have
> to understand OOXML OPC more.  The spec looks very confusing to me.
> Regards,
> SC34/WG4 Convenor
> MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)

Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 16:24:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:12 UTC