W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xmlsec@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Constrained implementation of exclusive C14N -- waht breaks?

From: Pratik Datta <pratik.datta@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:00:37 -0700
Message-ID: <49F090A5.6020203@oracle.com>
To: Konrad Lanz <Konrad.Lanz@iaik.tugraz.at>
CC: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, XMLSec WG Public List <public-xmlsec@w3.org>
Konrad,
Do you have any practical examples of signatures that require anything 
beyond Case 4 ?

Pratik

Konrad Lanz wrote:
> Konrad Lanz schrieb:
>   
>> The inheritable context for xml:base/lang/space and namespaces is
>> maintained in stacks on the fly and pushed down into orphaned nodes
>>     
>
> irrespective of whether they are in the node-set or not
>
>   
>> , it's really as simple as that.
>>   
>>     
>
> Just wanted to emphasize this ...
>
>   
Received on Thursday, 23 April 2009 16:09:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:43:58 GMT